Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] sysctl/infiniband: Fixes infiniband sysctl bounds
Joel Granados <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.rdma,gmane.linux.scsi,gmane.comp.file-systems.coda.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6obp2rythrcvlknqsczvxmhenhvxsosobc4cwx36iinyjjj5mr@b227ysqvp5vh> |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:41:05PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:58:20AM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Nicolas Bouchinet <[email protected]> > > > > Bound infiniband iwcm and ucma sysctl writings between SYSCTL_ZERO > > and SYSCTL_INT_MAX. > > > > The proc_handler has thus been updated to proc_dointvec_minmax. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Bouchinet <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c | 4 +++- > > drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 4 +++- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> > > How do you want to proceed from here? Should I take to RDMA repository? > > Thanks It would be great if we push this through RDMA. Here are a few comments: 1. Having the upper bound be SYSCTL_INT_MAX is not necessary (as it is silently capped by proc_dointvec_minmax, but it is good to have as it gives understanding on what the spread of the values are. 2. Having the lower bound capped by SYSCTL_ZERO is needed as it will prevent ppl trying to assing negative values to the unsigned integers Please let me know if you will push this through RDMA, so I know to remove it from sysctl. Best Reviewed-by: Joel Granados <[email protected]> -- Joel Granados