Re: [RFC][E2FSPROGS][PATCH 1/8]

Alexandre Ratchov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:52:13PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On May 24, 2006  16:36 +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > move the new 'bg_flags' field of the ext2_group_desc structure in
> > order to make room for the MSB of the 64bit fields.
> 
> Since the BIG_BG support is a mke2fs-time option (i.e. it is impossible
> to convert an existing filesystem to this layout) Laurent and I had
> previously discussed changing the ext3_group_desc struct to be 256 bytes
> in size in order to more easily accomodate the larger fields.
> 
> The reason I'm concerned about using up these fields in the existing
> group descriptor is that some other features such as inode and block
> bitmap checksums, the group descriptor checksum, and the itable "high
> watermark" value (which could be enabled on existing filesystems) all
> need space in the existing group descriptor also.
> 
> That is at least 4 + 4 + 1 + 2 = 11 bytes, and there are only 7 left
> after the BIG_BG changes...
> 

I like the idea of changing descriptor size; perhaps we could allow group
descriptors to have variable size (in an analogous way to the inode variable
size)?

cheers,

-- 
Alexandre


-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.