Re: [RFC] reserved inode fields to use for i_blocks_high

Hi,

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:00 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:

> Stephen instead suggested using one of the other HURD-reserved fields
> on the assumption that HURD won't support > 16TB files until after
> they have moved the reserved fields to extended attributes.

This would also leave the frag fields usable for (say) epoch extension.
Are there any hurd people on this list who could express a preference
for which of this limited set of features they'd like to enable on that
platform?

--Stephen