Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chase Venters wrote: > Now, granted, I really do agree with you about the whole code sharing > thing. A fresh start is often just what you need. I'm just questioning > if it wouldn't be better to do this fresh start immediately after going > 48-bit, rather than before. That way, existing users that want that > extra umph can have it today. Then you continue to crap up the code with if (48bit) ... else ... etc. The proper way to do this is "cp -a ext3 ext4" (excluding JBD as Andrew mentioned), and then let evolution take its course. "Evolution" means the standard Linux developement -- patch the kernel, patch e4fsprogs, test, lather rinse repeat. The best development platform for new features is one that _works_, and keeps working. Jeff