Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Alex Tomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems |
|---|---|
| Organization | HOME |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
what if proposed patch is safer than an average fix? (given that it's just out of usage unless enabled) thanks, Alex >>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes: JG> Mike Snitzer wrote: >> On 6/9/06, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> > I disagree completely... it would be an obvious win: people who want >>> > stability get that, people who want new features get that too. >>> >>> And developers have a better outlet for their wacky developmental >>> urges... >> >> And no real-world near-term progress is made for production users with >> modern requirements. What you're advocating breeds instability in the >> near-term. JG> Constantly patching the main, "stable" Linux filesystem breeds JG> instability today. JG> Jeff JG> _______________________________________________ JG> Ext2-devel mailing list JG> [email protected] JG> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel