Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:00:15PM -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Chase Venters wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Alex Tomas wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>  would "#if CONFIG_EXT3_EXTENTS" be a good solution then?
> >>
> >> Let's put it this way:
> >> - have you had _any_ valid argument at all against "ext4"?
> >>
> >> Think about it. Honestly. Tell me anything that doesn't work?
> >
> >Now, granted, I really do agree with you about the whole code sharing 
> >thing. A fresh start is often just what you need. I'm just questioning if 
> >it wouldn't be better to do this fresh start immediately after going 
> >48-bit, rather than before. That way, existing users that want that extra 
> >umph can have it today.
> >
> 
> Let me clarify that I don't have a final answer or opinion for whether or 
> not 48-bit belongs in ext3 or ext4. But I'm trying to illustrate that it's 
> an important question to raise.
> 
> In Group A we have some number of users that must have 48-bit support by 
> Date B. 48-bit support could be available in ext3 by Date A, before Date 
> B. It could also be available in ext4 by Date X, along with a handful of 
> other features.
> 
> Is Date X before Date B? If it's not, is it worth telling Group A to 
> suffer for a while, or asking them to use ext4 before it's ready? These 
> are the questions I'd have to know the answers to if I were the one 
> casting a final decision.

There are many points mentioned in this discussion like:
- possibility of regressions for existing users
- time until the new code is actually stable and well-tested
- long-term maintainability

The faster availability is a point, but it's only one amongst many 
points.

And it's not that we are talking about a feature not yet available in 
Linux at all. Instead of suffering, couldn't the few people in urgent 
need of 48-bit support use JFS or XFS?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.