Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Theodore Tso wrote: > As far as people who want to use ext3 as the beginning point > to do something that is has no forwards- compatibility, there's > nothing stopping them from creating a jgarzikfs if they want. But I > think I can speak for most of the ext3 development community that we > feel that one of the strengths of ext2/3 is its ability to do smooth > upgrades (and in many cases, downgrades as well, when people need to > migrate a filesystem so it can be mounted on older kernels), and that > it's one of the reasons why ext3 has been more succesful, than say, > JFS. When did I ever say smooth upgrades were a bad idea? The whole point of 'cp -a ext3 ext4' is to ensure smooth upgrades continue. A key theme is to avoid -backporting- all this new stuff that's going into ext4. IMO ext3 shouldn't be a devel platform at this point in its lifecycle. Jeff