Re: Agenda for ext3 developer interlock call (June 21th, 2006, 8:00PCT)

"Stephen C. Tweedie" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:22 +0400, Alex Tomas wrote:

> my only concern is that ext4's going to get features yet to be designed,
> coded and tested. so it's going to take quite long. I was hoping we
> could get ext3+ which incorporates already implemented and tested things
> like extents (delayed allocation probably). that could be a short-term
> solution for those who need large fs support now/soon and it would be
> forward compatible with nextgen ext4.

Right; one of the reasons for making an ext4 tree but registering it as
"ext3dev" in the short term would be to make it explicit that the
filesystem is not feature complete, and so to support adding things like
extents quickly while allowing more features to be added later before
closing the door on the "ext4" feature set.

--Stephen



Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.