Re: [PATCH 1/9] extents for ext4
Alex Tomas <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:29:56 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | ClusterFS Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
>> From a quick scan:
AM> - The code is very poorly commented. I'd want to spend a lot of time
AM> reviewing this implementation, but not in its present state.
what sort of comments are you expecting?
AM> - Far, far too many inlines
probably, I'll review the code in this regard
AM> - overly-terse variable naming
same
AM> - There are several places which appear to be putting block numbers into
AM> an `int'.
same
AM> - Needs kmalloc()->kzalloc() conversion
OK
AM> - replace all brelse() calls with put_bh(). Because brelse() is
AM> old-fashioned, has a weird name and neelessly permits a NULL arg.
AM> In fact it would be beter to convert JBD and ext3 to put_bh before
AM> copying it all over.
OK
AM> - The open-coded __clear_bit(BH_New, ...) in ext4_ext_get_blocks is a bit
AM> nasty. We can live with nasty, but are we sure that it isn't buggy??
I believe it isn't buggy -- it applies to non-shared var.
it also showed minor improvement on SMP.
AM> - It has about 7,000 instances of
AM> if ((lhs = expression)) {
AM> whereas the preferred coding style is
AM> lhs = expression;
AM> if (lhs) {
OK
AM> - The existing comments could benefit from some rework by a native English
AM> speaker.
could someone assist here, please?
thanks, Alex
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642