Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
Roman Zippel <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > That also being said... does a 32-bit sector_t make any sense on a > 48-bit-blocknumber filesystem? I'd have thought that we'd just make ext4 > depend on 64-bit sector_t and be done with it. Is this really necessary? There are a few features, which would make ext4 also interesting at the low end (e.g. extents). Storing 64bit values on disk is fine, but they should be converted to native values as soon as possible. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html