Re: [PATCH 1/9] extents for ext4
Mingming Cao <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:13:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM LTC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:17:55 -0400 > Theodore Tso <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:39:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > - replace all brelse() calls with put_bh(). Because brelse() is > > > old-fashioned, has a weird name and neelessly permits a NULL arg. > > > > > > In fact it would be beter to convert JBD and ext3 to put_bh before > > > copying it all over. > > > > Wouldn't it be better to preserve in the source code history the > > brelse->put_bh conversion? We can pour a huge number of changes in > > ext4 before we submit, but I would have thought it would be easier for > > everyone to see what is going on if we submit with just the minimal > > changes, and then have patches that address concerns like this one at > > a time. > > > > I'd suggest that this be one of the cleanups which be done within ext3 > before taking the ext4 copy. Looked at this today -- currently brelse() and __brelse() will check the b_count before calling put_bh(). I think it's okay to replace put_bh() without checking the b_count, as we always call put_bh() with get_bh ()....but want to confirm with you. Mingming ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642