Re: [PATCH 1/9] extents for ext4

Mingming Cao <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:13:09 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel
Organization IBM LTC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:17:55 -0400
> Theodore Tso <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:39:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > - replace all brelse() calls with put_bh().  Because brelse() is
> > >   old-fashioned, has a weird name and neelessly permits a NULL arg.
> > > 
> > >   In fact it would be beter to convert JBD and ext3 to put_bh before
> > >   copying it all over.
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be better to preserve in the source code history the
> > brelse->put_bh conversion?  We can pour a huge number of changes in
> > ext4 before we submit, but I would have thought it would be easier for
> > everyone to see what is going on if we submit with just the minimal
> > changes, and then have patches that address concerns like this one at
> > a time.
> > 
> 
> I'd suggest that this be one of the cleanups which be done within ext3
> before taking the ext4 copy.


Looked at this today -- currently brelse() and __brelse() will check the
b_count before calling put_bh().  I think it's okay to replace put_bh()
without checking the b_count, as we always call put_bh() with get_bh
()....but want to confirm with you.

Mingming


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642