Re: [PATCH] fix ext3 mounts at 16T

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:13:14 -0500
> Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> (a similar patch could be done for ext2; does anyone in their right mind use ext2 at 16T?
> 
> well, a bug's a bug.  People might want to ue 16TB ext2 for comparative
> performance testing, or because they get their jollies from running fsck or
> something.

ext2 and ext3 have seemingly already diverged a bit, but I suppose no reason to 
let it go further.

>> I'll send an ext2 patch doing the same thing if that's warranted)
> 
> please, when you have nothing better to do ;)

Will do :)

-Eric

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642