Re: [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters

Mingming Cao <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:59:34 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel
Organization IBM LTC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:45 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Mingming Cao wrote:
> > Eric, the total number of blocks on the filesystem(s_blocks_count) is a 
> >  unsigned long long(sector_t) for ext4, so I suggest we use a unsigned 
> > long long type loop counters here, fix the overflow issue, and works for 
> > both ext3 and ext4:)
> 
> That's fine with me, although I was taking the approach of:
> 
> 1. make it <container-size> clean, then
> 2. bump the container size up...
>
> How much do we want to intermix full 32-bit fixes with the 64-bit 
> changes?  All at once or step by step?  Step by step seems like a safer 
> approach, though it probably means reworking some of the 64-bit patches 
> (I'll sign up to do that work if 32-bit stuff goes in first...)
> 

Either way is fine with me ... 

But I think making the loop counter to unsigned value seems more
straightforward than keep it as int type, and adding a check of < 0 in
the end condition.

Thanks,
Mingming



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642