Re: Should block-number-in-file vars be using blkcnt_t?
Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:32:22 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andreas Dilger wrote: > I have "[UPDATE][PATCH]add ext3_fileblk_t for file relative offset" on 06/29 > in my mail folder. It was sent to ext2-devel and lkml. Thanks, I'll search on that. Sorry, I came late to this :) >> I'd like to see the patches split out large filesystems from large files >> to a greater degree, just to keep things saner IMHO... but if they're on >> the verge of going in then no point to that I suppose. > > As yet I don't think much work has gone into the large file support. > I think the consensus was that 8TB fixes are bugfixes and do not deserve a > feature flag. Ok, I wondered about that too - because mounting > 8T an older kernel will surely cause problems. But maybe it's just buyer beware in this case (and older kernels actually fail to even mount, so it's probably fairly safe). Thanks, -Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642