Re: SQLite and ext3 journalling mode
Dan Kennedy <[email protected]> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:52:32 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext3.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/07/2010 04:31 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:42:08AM +0700, Dan Kennedy wrote: >> >> Are SQLite users that are worried about losing data that has been >> committed (fsynced) better off setting data=journal than >> data=ordered (or even data=writeback)? > > Well, they won't be better off a data integrity point of view. > Depending on how SQLite is configured, and how many fsync's are issued > by SQLite in response to application queries, and depending on your > background workload by other applications, using data=journal *might* > be a performance win. > > In general, though, if you have background workloads that are > downloading torrents, data=journal is going to hurt a lot. So I don't > recommend it except for fairly specialized deployments where there's > only one primary user of the file system. Thanks. But to be clear, is data=ordered better than data=writeback wrt. data integrity following a power failure? Regards, Dan.