Re: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory

--Qf1oXS95uex85X0R
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 11:37:19AM +0200, J=F6rn Engel wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2004 10:22:26 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this:
> >=20
> > I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now...
>=20
> Should have.  I've written patches for intermezzo a year ago.
> Maintenance is a little slow these days. :)

Likewise. I have a patch[0] for intermezzo stack lossage from 2.5.73
era that hasn't been applied yet, AFAIK. =20

[0] http://www.mulix.org/patches/intermezzo-stack-lossage-2.5.73.diff

Cheers,=20
Muli=20
--=20
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/


--Qf1oXS95uex85X0R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAlhprKRs727/VN8sRAjF2AJ9+FxIJJGkmORIiA9nmglwW6cfTEQCeIsr3
U2Wzi8Jfo11bghLqTicqGh4=
=RfqQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qf1oXS95uex85X0R--