Re: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: Set allowed quota types

Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general
Message-ID <3391F66C-E2A7-4FC8-8696-3C1600D54DA9__2599.18427696011$1412711189$gmane$org@dilger.ca>
On Oct 7, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue 07-10-14 07:30:28, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> We support user, group, and project quotas. Tell VFS about it.
>>> 
>>> CC: [email protected]
>>> CC: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>>> index b194652033cd..b32e998e8cbc 100644
>>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>>> @@ -1419,6 +1419,8 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
>>> 	sb->s_export_op = &xfs_export_operations;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA
>>> 	sb->s_qcop = &xfs_quotactl_operations;
>>> +	sb->s_dquot.allowed_types = (1 << USRQUOTA) | (1 << GRPQUOTA) |
>>> +				    (1 << PRJQUOTA);
>> 
>> Would it be better to define masks for these rather than open
>> coding these shifts everywhere?
>  I can do that. Any suggestion for a name? I was thinking about it for a
> while and couldn't come up with anything satisfactory...

Better to have QUOTA at the start, and TYPE in the name, so maybe:

enum quota_types {
	QUOTA_TYPE_USR = 1 << USRQUOTA,
	QUOTA_TYPE_GRP = 1 << GRPQUOTA,
	QUOTA_TYPE_PRJ = 1 << PRJQUOTA,
};

or maybe "enum quota_type_mask" or similar.

I prefer named enums over #defines since this makes it more clear
when declaring variables like "allowed_types" what valid values are
instead of just "int" that someone might mistakenly set to USRQUOTA
directly or something.

Cheers, Andreas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=1Ues
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.