Re: jfsutils: development status and license

Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 08/03/2015 04:42 AM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that jfsutils is not actively developed. The last version was
> published in 2011. Is this package will be further developed?

Not really. I've made a few fixes in cvs since then, but never got
around to creating a new release. I probably should.

> I also have two questions relating to license.
> 
> I want to build support for JFS in lua language. This will allow to
> interactively work at a low level with JFS (eg. better debugging and
> testing). The problem is that lua is released under the MIT license,
> and jfsutils under the GPL. Is it possible to write such tool without
> breaking the GPL. I'm afraid that GPL will in this case too
> restrictive.

I'm not a lawyer, but I would assume as long as you didn't copy code
from jfsutils, you should be able to do that.

> I would also build basic support for JFS (mkfs.jsf and fsck.jfs) in
> the toybox (http://www.landley.net/toybox/). I am afraid that such
> support for JFS can be very difficult to implement, because toybox is
> published under the BSD license. Is it necessary to rewrite the whole
> JFS functionality from scratch, so as not to violate the GPL?

I haven't worked on BSD projects, so I'm no expert, but I believe
putting GPL code into a BSD product is not feasible.

> Is it possible to publish jfsutils on a more liberal license (MIT,
> BSD)? Currently, JFS can not compete with XFS, and without good
> support for this filesystem JFS will become increasingly marginalized.

A similar request was made several years ago and IBM decided against it
then. Since IBM released the code under GPLv2, they'd be the only ones
that could release it under a different license, and I no longer work
for them. I don't think they care much about JFS on Linux anymore, but
it's still their enterprise filesystem on AIX, so I assume they somewhat
care about the intellectual property rights.

> 
> Best regards,
> Daniel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.