jfs: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
Christian Kujau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This just happend on a PowerPC (32 bit) box running Debian/stable and a
vanilla 4.6.0-rc7 kernel:
=========================================================
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
4.6.0-rc7 #2 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/272 just changed the state of lock:
(&jfs_ip->rdwrlock#2){++++-.}, at: [<c01f0840>] jfs_get_block+0x50/0x370
but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
(&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){+.+.+.}
Full dmesg & .config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/4.6.0-rc7/
The system is still up & running and I didn't notice any ill effects so
far. The box has its root disk formatted with with JFS for a long time
now and this has never happened and I suspect an ongoing compile job must
have triggered the lockdep warning, as the box isn't normally doing much
compilation.
I found a similar report[0] from 2009 and also one in the kernel
bugzilla[1], but both are really old.
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.2/01271.html
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
--
BOFH excuse #148:
Insert coin for new game
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j