Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 28/42] drbd: switch to proc_create_single
Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> Fri, 18 May 2018 14:55:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20180518125554.GA9238__49033.5427261472$1526680756$gmane$org@soda.linbit> |
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And stop messing with try_module_get on THIS_MODULE, which doesn't make
> any sense here.
The idea was to increase module count on /proc/drbd access.
If someone holds /proc/drbd open, previously rmmod would
"succeed" in starting the unload, but then block on remove_proc_entry,
leading to a situation where the lsmod does not show drbd anymore,
but /proc/drbd being still there (but no longer accessible).
I'd rather have rmmod fail up front in this case.
And try_module_get() seemed most appropriate.
Lars
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot