Re: Jfs-discussion Digest, Vol 124, Issue 4
Robert Wilson <[email protected]> Sat, 25 May 2019 11:22:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALPNbd2RfoYNec7s85KRgjM1zpOCkDrGxA1cuBQS9Oh2Oz5xXA@mail.gmail.com> |
Now that ibm owns redat, perhaps jfs should be actively developed? On Tue, May 21, 2019, 7:12 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Jfs-discussion mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Jfs-discussion digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: jfs missing features (Dave Kleikamp) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:06:36 -0500 > From: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> > To: argante <[email protected]>, JFS Discussion > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] jfs missing features > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On 5/8/19 3:22 PM, argante via Jfs-discussion wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, sorry I let this sit in my inbox this long. > > > > > Is it planned to add (some of) these features to JFS: > > > > * fallocate(2) > > https://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy/blob/master/fs/jfs/file.c#L151 > > > > * 64 bit time type issue > > > https://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy/blob/master/fs/jfs/jfs_types.h#L45 > > > > * DAX support > > > https://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy/blob/master/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt > > No plans for any of these at this time. JFS has not been under active > development for a long time. I continue to maintain it to keep it > functioning, but it's not a high priority for me any more. > > I'd be happy to accept patches from anybody interested in implementing > any of these, and I'm available to help with any questions, but I don't > have plans for any of this. > > > > > These things seem to be the most missing in JFS (DAX for advanced users). > > > > Best regards, > > Daniel > > Thanks for your interest, > > Shaggy > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Jfs-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Jfs-discussion Digest, Vol 124, Issue 4 > ********************************************** > _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion