Re: rxk5 openafs for windows work in progress--seems to work

Jeff and Marcus,

K5ssl (or whatever it is named) keeps showing up as a potential solution 
to problems.   I wish some of those problems were not vaguely 
political.  Perhaps cryptographic performance gives some technical 
justification for preferring it.  I rather think the conservative 
solution is (a), though.

Matt

Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> <snip>
>
> (a) OpenAFS for Windows can shipped a modified MIT krb5_32.dll
>     under the name afskrb5_32.dll and include it as part of the
>     OAFW installer.  This library would effectively re-export
>     the contents of the krb5_32.dll library and add copies of
>     the functions that are not being exported.
>
> (b) Since we have k5ssl and I already build OpenSSL for many other
>     purposes, perhaps a short term solution would be to build k5ssl
>     for Windows and statically link to libeay.lib.
> <snip>
>   


-- 

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309