Re: Windows Non-Interactive Logons (aka Scheduled Tasks) and AFS

Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is anyone going to be upset if I disable integrated logon support for
> non-interactive logon sessions such as those produced by "Scheduled
> Tasks"?

Sounds good to me.  In fact, I'd prefer it if integrated logon was not 
enabled by default in the installers.

> It has been brought to my attention that for each non-interactive
> logon session a new Kerberos v5 credential cache server is being
> spawned.  As
> a result, some systems that provide large numbers of remote process
> executions are falling over when the maximum number of processes is
> reached.
>
> I have committed code to disable integrated logon support until such
> time as I can figure out how to ensure that when the executed process
> terminates that the Kerberos v5 credential cache server is terminated.

Ah, ok.

<<CDC