Re: OpenAFS client softlockup on highly concurrential file-system patterns (100% CPU in kernel mode)

Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.openafs.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:53:59PM +0200, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
> 
> My setup is as follows:
> 
> * OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, kernel 5.3.9-1-default, client package
> `openafs-client` and `openafs-kmp-default` at `1.8.5_k5.3.9_1-1.3` as
> provided by OpenSUSE;
> 
> * `afsd` parameters (neither memory cache (on `tmpfs`) or disk cache seems
> to help;  neither daemons from 4 to 1;  encryption is off):
> 
> ~~~~
> -verbose -blocks 7864320 -chunksize 17 -files 524288 -files_per_subdir 128
> -dcache 524288 -stat 524288 -volumes 128 -splitcache 90/10 -afsdb
> -dynroot-sparse -fakestat-all -inumcalc md5 -backuptree -daemons 1
> -rxmaxfrags 8 -rxmaxmtu 1500 -rxpck 4096 -nosettime
> ~~~~
> -verbose -memcache -blocks 1048576 -chunksize 17 -stat 524288 -volumes 128
> -splitcache 90/10 -afsdb -dynroot-sparse -fakestat-all -inumcalc md5
> -backuptree -daemons 1 -rxmaxfrags 8 -rxmaxmtu 1500 -rxpck 4096 -nosettime
> ~~~~
> 
> * the server is also on OpenSUSE Leap 15.0, with `openafs-server` package at
> `1.8.0-lp150.2.2.1` as provided by OpenSUSE;
> 
> * I suspect that perhaps the issue is due to the latest kernel version,
> because I have run similar patterns a few weeks ago on an older kernel (but
> still from the `5.x` family), but can't say for sure;

I see the diagnostics and further data points later in the thread, but are
you in a position to boot an older kernel to attempt to confirm/refute this
hypothesis?

Thanks,

Ben
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.