Re: dirtyflag vulnerability and OpenAFS
Jakob Haufe <[email protected]> Fri, 8 May 2026 10:38:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.openafs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260508103834.7e5614cb@beer> |
--Sig_/DrMtA.c9ODK1s9smVNiIKwn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 8 May 2026 08:33:33 +0000 Matteo Fois <[email protected]> wrote: > Also we were curious to know what happens if one uses the kafs kernel > module instead of the OpenAFS client, does the blacklisted module > create any problem? That won't work as kafs depends on rxrpc. Cheers, sur5r --=20 ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam. --Sig_/DrMtA.c9ODK1s9smVNiIKwn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEe/X2rDZDH11A3BN6TPKyGPVNrj0FAmn9oQsACgkQTPKyGPVN rj33uxAAvGElVARNBrE9IT8nWSYXpBn3J9oqgEKThkWNq0Id+L8L2lw58GSaZH7w ueLqsReyGOlGM6smVrz9FEbV8voT6UsVu0Y0k4k4jvngkMRdz1IY8gLoLWy8JwXk Kb8DGksoUwpi/Z6RsmlUubidxIZ7WpvRWjV2YHYyY08e25gIkWxuAB1UazfJ+yP0 gJnh5kM8UV0AE3adxQ6db+57nqpjhzfW0bM5EeCqjbNq9KMbfwb6aLwg8U3lvDcc f4FiDcDT6FMkgzII5CX89cCXQTrx8N/snUovw3atTqQD5JBqL+vPrmUaHJyDE63b ncEN76S5qduI02MGCiZCLsZvKOmgRFPwlUn2GVfmRhMSgu+qSunK1gUFqLT5XaJl cgX8Bu+KlRQXz0DPml1QFiUn8KTIs8YbO2qQAMQb+TBzzQHV51eUX/UFRXTsk9gh 2qL3iZqsKd9U9gfD0O15CaUq6mvDeoLUj+CdvYc0G2ogst/TZNrtzwa7GEqKVd0P OcGCv1ZoFn/oTeel3W2S4ZUTl5kZuHnvxrO14KtlvqKXvlpOgBufL1Yqi+3yWRON xZ7JOz7vAD/cihprnz/jwM2XpidW27oEzwOjyxjLqhyLmB7U4RWBK7YRbtDiB0zd hERC67QW2CTrZjNlZyv/fdeKHsaFUZsia4jnHoxgLkFu+gEyRs0= =3kzw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DrMtA.c9ODK1s9smVNiIKwn--