Re: [PATCH] fs/reiserfs/inode: remove dead code in _get_block_create_0()

Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.reiserfs.general,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <20220726104842.flhaivkpbikqlhki@quack3>
On Wed 20-07-22 16:30:29, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Zeng Jingxiang <[email protected]>
> 
> Since commit 27b3a5c51b50 ("kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: drop the fs race
> watchdog from _get_block_create_0()"), which removed a label that may
> have the pointer 'p' touched in its control flow, related if statements
> now eval to constant value now. Just remove them.
> 
> Assigning value NULL to p here
> 293     char *p = NULL;
> 
> In the following conditional expression, the value of p is always NULL,
> As a result, the kunmap() cannot be executed.
> 308	if (p)
> 309		kunmap(bh_result->b_page);
> 
> 355	if (p)
> 356		kunmap(bh_result->b_page);
> 
> 366	if (p)
> 367		kunmap(bh_result->b_page);
> 
> Also, the kmap() cannot be executed.
> 399	if (!p)
> 400		p = (char *)kmap(bh_result->b_page);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Jingxiang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <[email protected]>

Thanks! I've added the patch to my tree. I've also removed the unnecessary
initialization of 'p' to NULL. I'll push the patch to Linus in the coming
merge window.

									Honza

> ---
>  fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 10 +---------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
> index 0cffe054b78e..fe26e1746af9 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
> @@ -305,8 +305,6 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>  	result = search_for_position_by_key(inode->i_sb, &key, &path);
>  	if (result != POSITION_FOUND) {
>  		pathrelse(&path);
> -		if (p)
> -			kunmap(bh_result->b_page);
>  		if (result == IO_ERROR)
>  			return -EIO;
>  		/*
> @@ -352,8 +350,6 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>  		}
>  
>  		pathrelse(&path);
> -		if (p)
> -			kunmap(bh_result->b_page);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  	/* requested data are in direct item(s) */
> @@ -363,8 +359,6 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>  		 * when it is stored in direct item(s)
>  		 */
>  		pathrelse(&path);
> -		if (p)
> -			kunmap(bh_result->b_page);
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -396,9 +390,7 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>  	 * sure we need to.  But, this means the item might move if
>  	 * kmap schedules
>  	 */
> -	if (!p)
> -		p = (char *)kmap(bh_result->b_page);
> -
> +	p = (char *)kmap(bh_result->b_page);
>  	p += offset;
>  	memset(p, 0, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize);
>  	do {
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.