Re: [PATCH 03/14] fs/buffer: replace ll_rw_block()
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.reiserfs.general,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.cluster.redhat.cluster.devel,gmane.comp.file-systems.ocfs2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20220831105125.mv2674t37yhns2sf@quack3> |
On Wed 31-08-22 15:21:00, Zhang Yi wrote: > ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync IO path because it skip buffers > which has been locked by others, it could lead to false positive EIO > when submitting read IO. So stop using ll_rw_block(), switch to use new > helpers which could guarantee buffer locked and submit IO if needed. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <[email protected]> > --- > fs/buffer.c | 13 ++++++------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c > index a663191903ed..e14adc638bfe 100644 > --- a/fs/buffer.c > +++ b/fs/buffer.c ... > @@ -1342,7 +1342,8 @@ void __breadahead(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size) > { > struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk(bdev, block, size); > if (likely(bh)) { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ | REQ_RAHEAD, 1, &bh); > + if (trylock_buffer(bh)) > + __bh_read(bh, REQ_RAHEAD, false); I suppose this can be bh_readahead()? > brelse(bh); > } > } Otherwise the patch looks good. Honza -- Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR