Re: [PATCH v3 0/29] block: Make blkdev_get_by_*() return handle

Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.drbd.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel,gmane.linux.scsi.target.devel,gmane.linux.drivers.mtd,gmane.comp.file-systems.nilfs.user,gmane.linux.scsi,gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel,gmane.linux.power-management.general,gmane.comp.file-systems.reiserfs.general,gmane.linux.block,gmane.linux.kernel.bcache.devel,gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.file-systems.f2fs,gmane.comp.file-systems.ocfs2.devel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs
Message-ID <20230828170744.iifdmaw732cfiauf@quack3>
On Fri 25-08-23 15:32:47, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:48:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > this is a v3 of the patch series which implements the idea of blkdev_get_by_*()
> > calls returning bdev_handle which is then passed to blkdev_put() [1]. This
> > makes the get and put calls for bdevs more obviously matching and allows us to
> > propagate context from get to put without having to modify all the users
> > (again!). In particular I need to propagate used open flags to blkdev_put() to
> > be able count writeable opens and add support for blocking writes to mounted
> > block devices. I'll send that series separately.
> > 
> > The series is based on Christian's vfs tree as of today as there is quite
> > some overlap. Patches have passed some reasonable testing - I've tested block
> > changes, md, dm, bcache, xfs, btrfs, ext4, swap. More testing or review is
> > always welcome. Thanks! I've pushed out the full branch to:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git bdev_handle
> > 
> > to ease review / testing. Since there were not many comments for v2 and
> > Christoph has acked the series I think we should start discussing how to merge
> > the series. Most collisions with this series seem to happen in the filesystems
> > area so VFS tree would seem as the least painful way to merge this. Jens,
> 
> I really do like this series especially struct bdev_handle and moving
> the mode bits in there. I'll happily take this. So far there have only
> been minor things that can easily be fixed.

Thanks. Since Al is fine with just doing a potential conversion to 'struct
file' as a handle on top of this series (it will be dumb Coccinelle
replacement) I think we can go ahead with the series as is. As you said
there will be some conflicts in btrfs and I've learned about f2fs conflicts
as well so I can rebase & repost the series on top of rc1 to make life
easier for you.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack-IBi9RG/[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.