Re: how to check sfs installation
"Juan Carlos Schroeder" <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Aug 2004 01:28:16 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.sfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, apparently (/var/log/messages or sfscd -d) sfs starts with no problem. I've installed RedHat8 (kernel 2.4.18-14) with NFS3 support, and portmap is running. When I do a "cd /sfs/@sfs.fs.net" it quickly prints that the directory does not exist not sending anything over the network. Do these precompiled binaries work in Linux? I suppose I should try recompiling the source and see. Particularly, what I want to do is use LBFS capabilities/features of SFS, because I plan to use quite low bandwith connections. Thanks, Juan Carlos. "David Mazieres" <[email protected]> escribió en el mensaje news:[email protected]... > > From: "Juan Carlos Schroeder" <[email protected]> > > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:05:57 -0300 > > > > Hi: > > > > I've installed SFS on Linux, with precompiled binaries (rpms) and it did not > > work. > > I do a "cd /sfs/@sfs.fs.net..." as the manual suggests to test installation > > and it does not work. It prints that the directory does not exist. The > > "/sfs" directory does exist, and I've started "sfscd". > > > > I'd appreciate any help. Are there any "logs" to see whether "sfscd" has > > started correctly or if there is any problem with sfs? > > Yes, sfs should send errors to the system log, in /var/log/messages. > > An easier way to get a sense of what is going on would be to run > "sfscd -d". The -d flag keeps it in the foreground and prints the > errors to your terminal. > > If you are using linux, make sure your kernel has NFS3 client support > enabled, and make sure you are running portmap. > > David > >