Re: Public SFS servers
Kuniyasu Suzaki <[email protected]> Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:02:56 +0900 (JST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.sfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Kevin,
SFSRO meets to our request. It looks like what I wanted!
I understand that "sfsrocd(sfs read only client daemon)" works to
relay the blocks which are downloaded. Is it true?
Can "sfsrocd" work as Bittorrent? I mean that "sfsrocd" makes
connections to some SFS mirrors("sfsrocd") and achieves good
performance and fault-tolerance.
Anyway I will try.
------
suzaki
>>From: Kevin Fu <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: Public SFS servers
>>
>>Unfortunately I cannot read Japanese, but you might be interested in
>>using our SFS read-only file system for secure mirroring of content on
>>untrusted replicas.
>>
>>The SFSRO code resides in the CVS repository, but it's not yet in the
>>official distribution. A client mounts an SFSRO file system much like
>>a normal SFS file system. The file path is a plain, old
>>self-certifying path. Untrusted replicas (e.g., volunteers) then
>>serve the "mirrored" content.
>>
>>See http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/papers/sfsro.html for technical details.
>>
>>If you're interested in trying the code, email me personally or read
>>through the rough documentation on
>>http://pdos.lcs.mit.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/sfs1/sfsrodb/README?;cvsroot=sfs
>>
>>--------
>>Kevin E. Fu ([email protected])
>>
>>>Martin,
>>>
>>>Thank you for your reply.
>>>
>>> >>From: Martin <[email protected]>
>>> >>Subject: Re: Public SFS servers (Re: SFS-KNOPPIX)
>>> >>
>>> >>> The boot time of SFS-KNOPPIX seems to depend on latency. The boot
>>> >>> time is 5 minutes in Japan but 30 minutes in US. We can prepare three
>>> >>> SFS sites in Japan but it is too far from US and EU.
>>> >>> This topic is discussed in the KNOPPIX Forum.
>>> >>> http://www.knoppix.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14904
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Can we use SFS server on PlanetLab?
>>> >>> Or is there any good solution? Can we use proxy for SFS?
>>> >>Given that SFS makes use of strong host authentication and crypto I
>>> >>guess it would have to be a mirror rather than a proxy - although a
>>> >>proxy is an interesting idea. You might be able to persuade some of the
>>> >>more free software friendly mirrors to start providing an SFS service -
>>> >>would certainly be useful.
>>>
>>>We kept three Mirror SFS servers in Japan.
>>>The sites are Univ. of Tsukuba, Alpha-systems Inc. and AIST(Original Sever).
>>>
>>>They are enough for Japanese users because latency is short.
>>>Unfortunately latency problem comes up outside Japan.
>>>
>>>We want to know practical examples of world wide mirroring of SFS servers.
>>>How about SFS servers for GRID?
>>> http://www.biogrid.jp/e/research_work/gro1/gsi_sfs/
>>>
>>>Our requested specifications are anonymous access, and Read-Only File
>>>System on Internet.
>>>
>>