Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: make xfs_inode_set_eofblocks_tag cheaper for the common case
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:02:09PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > I don't think taking it should be too bad, but given the ops ordering > > it also seems entirely pointless to even take it. > > > > Then why are we taking it? I assumed it at least served as a memory > barrier... I meant to take it for that early check, not in general. I guess this is another hint we should try to look into using proper atomic bitops here.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs