Re: [PATCH 2/6] xfs: shadow agfl indexes in the per-ag structures

Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 9/1/16 9:27 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
> 
> To verify that the AGFL contents is sane, we need to have access to
> the indexes that tell us what part of the AGFL is active. We cannot
> access the AGF buffer from the AGFL verifier, so we need to shadow
> these values in the struct xfs_perag so we check them when required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 4 ++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h        | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> index 23559b9..1aef556 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -2255,6 +2255,7 @@ xfs_alloc_get_freelist(
>  	be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flcount, -1);
>  	xfs_trans_agflist_delta(tp, -1);
>  	pag->pagf_flcount--;
> +	pag->pagf_flfirst = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst);
>  	xfs_perag_put(pag);
>  
>  	logflags = XFS_AGF_FLFIRST | XFS_AGF_FLCOUNT;

Still reviewing, but this kind of jumped out at me, seems like the get/put
functions are a bit jumbled up:

        /*
         * Get the block number and update the data structures.
         */
        agfl_bno = XFS_BUF_TO_AGFL_BNO(mp, agflbp);
        bno = be32_to_cpu(agfl_bno[be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst)]);
        be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flfirst, 1);
        xfs_trans_brelse(tp, agflbp);
        if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst) == XFS_AGFL_SIZE(mp))
                agf->agf_flfirst = 0;

        pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno));
        be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flcount, -1);
        xfs_trans_agflist_delta(tp, -1);
        pag->pagf_flcount--;
        xfs_perag_put(pag);


why is there a trans_brelse in between two lines which handle proper setting
of flfirst?  I was looking at this thinking about where the pag structures
get updated, then saw the kind of swiss-cheese placement of the first/count
manipulation...

If pagf_flcount/agf_flcount, pagf_flfirst/agf_flfirst etc need to stay in
sync, should there be a wrapper to encapsulate it all?

like:

xfs_agf_{advance/drop/remove}_first(mp, agf, pagf)
{
        be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flfirst, 1);
        if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst) == XFS_AGFL_SIZE(mp))
                agf->agf_flfirst = 0;
	pag->pagf_flfirst = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst);
        be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flcount, -1);
        pag->pagf_flcount--;
}

or something similar?

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.