Re: Clarification required about xfs_metadump and xfs_mdrestore
murali krishna <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:29:33 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOSFFygazt7umH314ZKXgbe0RrRCDL_0gvojHKnuGHxy_XZV+g@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============5638728505435402675== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145c86654ef6a053d874c93 --001a1145c86654ef6a053d874c93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Dave, Thanks for the clarification and inputs. Your support is much appreciated. Murali On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:27:12PM -0400, murali krishna wrote: > > Hi Darrick, > > > > Thanks for the response. > > > > Could you please clarify if there is any strong reason behind in stating > to > > use xfs_metadump and xfs_mdrestore as just debugging tools in their > > respective man pages ? > > The man page is simply stating the truth - metadump/restore are > debugging tools used by XFS developers for obtaining information > required for forensic analysis of filesystem failures. > > What you are wanting to do will not work, is not supported, and you > get to keep all the broken bits to yourself if you try it. > Every XFS developer you ask will say the same thing: > xfsdump/encrypt/mkfs/xfs_restore is the only way to do what you want > to do. > > -Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > [email protected] > --001a1145c86654ef6a053d874c93 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Dave,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for the clarification a= nd inputs. Your support is much appreciated.</div><div><div class=3D"gmail_= extra"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signatur= e"><br> <div>Murali</div></div></div> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dave Chinne= r <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_b= lank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gma= il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef= t:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:27:12PM -0400, murali kr= ishna wrote:<br> > Hi Darrick,<br> ><br> > Thanks for the response.<br> ><br> > Could you please clarify if there is any strong reason behind in stati= ng to<br> > use xfs_metadump and xfs_mdrestore as just debugging tools in their<br= > > respective man pages ?<br> <br> </span>The man page is simply stating the truth - metadump/restore are<br> debugging tools used by XFS developers for obtaining information<br> required for forensic analysis of filesystem failures.<br> <br> What you are wanting to do will not work, is not supported, and you<br> get to keep all the broken bits to yourself if you try it.<br> Every XFS developer you ask will say the same thing:<br> xfsdump/encrypt/mkfs/xfs_<wbr>restore is the only way to do what you want<b= r> to do.<br> <span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br> -Dave.<br> --<br> Dave Chinner<br> <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br> </font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div> --001a1145c86654ef6a053d874c93-- --===============5638728505435402675== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============5638728505435402675==--