Re: Fixing absolute install fails on OSX
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:32:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG4opy8fDK61HGF+UdowFWWrnK-Dw70EXgkijdGpojGv16WV4w@mail.gmail.com> |
On 10 September 2015 at 13:15, Ilja Honkonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > While installing gcc from a local interface I got this, which apparently > was executed after my configure & make & make install: > > Absolute install > name=/private/var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS/gcc-any-any/lib/libcilkrts.5.dylib > in > /private/var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS/gcc-any-any/lib/libcilkrts.5.dylib; > fixing... > Absolute install > name=/private/var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS/gcc-any-any/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib > in > /private/var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS/gcc-any-any/lib/libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib; > fixing... > fatal error: install_name_tool: input file: > /private/var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS/gcc-any-any/lib/libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib > is Mach-O dynamic shared library stub file and can't be changed > File > "/Users/iljah/.cache/0install.net/implementations/sha256new_JVBP6RCR3JVWBOBYLB7HOYFDV2FXGMUPDW4GCMZY7U2KHVUFFWYA/build.py", > line 95, in shorten_dynamic_library_install_name > subprocess.check_call(['install_name_tool', '-id', shortname, > dylib_file]) > subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['install_name_tool', '-id', > u'libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib', > u'/private/var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS/gcc-any-any/lib/libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib']' > returned non-zero exit status 1 > Command failed with exit status 1 > > Build failed: leaving build directory > /var/folders/ff/m6cylxhd2csdz9fh62g3djtm0000gq/T/0compile-GFyugS for > inspection... > > > What's wrong with absolute installs and do they have to be fixed here? > Thanks I don't know. This is in 0compile, but it's in some OS X-only code. I suspect it's trying to replace some full path names with relative paths, since otherwise the binary it compiled can't be relocated. Anders, I think you wrote this. What is it doing? -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140