Re: some problems and questions
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:51:51 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG4opy_-AoUYpu93yCU+Y--8S+wz2Q6sN+pi78XA8K2bFyGC7g@mail.gmail.com> |
On 12 November 2015 at 23:19, Philip Miess <[email protected]> wrote: [ Note: gmail put this in my spam folder, claiming it wasn't really from yahoo; I found it after seeing Bastian's reply ] > hello, > I've been trying to create a feed for winbuilds sdl2 package, and > I've run into a number of problems. > > 1. The windows publishing tool crash if you past a > into a field. > 2. The windows tools doesn't seem to know what a *.txz archive. > > So I started looking at using the Linux publish tool. > > 3. Gentoo no longer has a zero install package, or most of ROX for that > matter. > 4. Gentoo also doesn't have all the necessary versions of software > installable to compile it. I think it was some Ocaml package dependency > that foiled this attempt Looks like Gentoo does have opam, which you can use to get all the dependencies (or just "opam install 0install"). > These are not directly your area of course, but still of interest to you. > so I downloaded the binary package and installed that in my home bin > directory. > > Running the install for 0publish-gui I noticed that it required zero > install 1.14, which is odd running in 2.10, and that it wasn't picking > up the gentoo GPG package that is its dependency and is listed in the feed. > > 0launch posts a message taller than the screen when you cancel. > > I created a native feed with > <package-implementation distributions="Gentoo" main="/usr/bin/gpg" > package="app-crypt/gnupg"/> > and that seemed to work not sure if its because its a native feed or if > the full package path works better. Yes, I guess it didn't know the name of the Gentoo gpg package, and selected a really old version of 0install from before it specified that dependency. I've added your line to the gnupg feed, so it might work now. For reference, on a cleanish Fedora 21 machine I get: $ 0install select http://0install.net/2007/interfaces/0publish-gui.xml - URI: http://0install.net/2007/interfaces/0publish-gui.xml Version: 0.14 Path: (not cached) - URI: http://repo.roscidus.com/python/python Version: 2.7.8-11.21 Path: (package:rpm:python:2.7.8-11.21:x86_64) - URI: http://0install.net/2007/interfaces/ZeroInstall.xml Version: 2.3.5 Path: /home/user/.cache/0install.net/implementations/sha256new_WJTXRQOJFWFYBVFWITHSXEPGWXBX5YTSQXVT5DUT7RMUTIH6ETYQ - URI: http://repo.roscidus.com/security/gnupg Version: 2.0.29-1.21 Path: (package:rpm:gnupg2:2.0.29-1.21:x86_64) - URI: http://repo.roscidus.com/python/python-gobject Version: 2.28.6-13.21 Path: (package:rpm:pygobject2:2.28.6-13.21:x86_64) - URI: http://rox.sourceforge.net/2005/interfaces/ROX-Lib Version: 2.0.6 Path: (not cached) (I've just moved house and am accessing the net via a mobile phone, so won't try downloading a Gentoo VM image at the moment) If you want to find out why it didn't pick a particular version, you can request a particular version like this to see the reason: $ 0install select http://0install.net/2007/interfaces/0publish-gui.xml \ --version-for http://0install.net/2007/interfaces/ZeroInstall.xml 2.3.4 If you have the GUI, you can also right-click on the version in the GUI and choose "Explain" from the menu. > 0publish-GUI doesn't seem to allow using nested groups like on windows. Looks like a bug. You can drag one group inside another afterwards though. > It seems to take a long time to add groups elements I suspect it's scanning the current directory for possibly binaries or documentation directories. Not very sensible behaviour if run from $HOME! > It doesn't list "application/x-xz-compressed-tar" for archives but > supplies that when guess is selected. Added. > It also complains if you save and test that there is no run element but > of course libs shouldnt have them. Seems reasonable - there's nothing to test in that case. It doesn't know whether you're testing a library or a buggy application feed. > Here is what I have so far let me know if its flawed, or could be better > > <?xml version="1.0" ?> > <interface > xmlns="http://zero-install.sourceforge.net/2004/injector/interface"> > <name>SDL2</name> > <summary>Simple DirectMedia Layer Version 2</summary> > <description> > Simple DirectMedia Layer is a cross-platform multimedia library designed to > > provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, 3D > hardware via > > OpenGL, and 2D video framebuffer. It is used by MPEG playback software, > > emulators, and many popular games, including the award winning Linux port of > > "Civilization: Call To Power." > > SDL supports Linux, Windows, Windows CE, BeOS, MacOS, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, > NetBSD, > > OpenBSD, BSD/OS, Solaris, IRIX, and QNX. The code contains support for > AmigaOS, > > Dreamcast, Atari, AIX, OSF/Tru64, RISC OS, SymbianOS, and OS/2, but > these are > > not officially supported. > > SDL is written in C, but works with C++ natively, and has bindings to > several > > other languages, including Ada, C#, D, Eiffel, Erlang, Euphoria, Guile, > Haskell, > > Java, Lisp, Lua, ML, Objective C, Pascal, Perl, PHP, Pike, Pliant, > Python, Ruby, > > Smalltalk, and Tcl.</description> > <homepage>http://www.libsdl.org</homepage> > <category>Graphics</category> > <icon href="http://www.libsdl.org/media/SDL_logo.png" type="image/png"/> > <group license="OSI Approved :: zlib/libpng License"> > <package-implementation distributions="Arch" package="sdl2"/> > <package-implementation distrobutions="Cygwin RPM" package="libSDL2"/> > <package-implementation distributions="Debian MacPorts" > package="libsdl2"/> > <package-implementation distributions="Gentoo" > package="media-libs/libsdl2"/> > <package-implementation distributions="Ports" package="sdl20"/> > <package-implementation distributions="Slack" package="SDL2"/> > <implementation arch="Windows-x86_64" doc-dir="doc/SDL2-2.0.3" > id="sha1new=fbd4e672a96fea2fa14a4839bf39d0c406d4e54a" > released="2015-11-28" version="2.0.3-1"> > <archive extract="windows_32" > href="http://win-builds.org/1.5.0/packages/windows_32/SDL2-2.0.3-1-i686-w64-mingw32.txz" > size="489620" type="application/x-xz-compressed-tar"/> > </implementation> > <implementation arch="Windows-i386" doc-dir="doc/SDL2-2.0.3" > id="sha1new=d02c29087ffb9c94fa8378510013f910c635907b" > released="11/28/2014" version="2.0.3-1"> > <archive extract="windows_64" > href="http://win-builds.org/1.5.0/packages/windows_64/SDL2-2.0.3-1-x86_64-w64-mingw32.txz" > size="503124" type="application/x-xz-compressed-tar"/> > </implementation> > </group> > </interface> Looks reasonable to me! I see 0publish-gui is only adding SHA1 hashes. That needs fixing too... > also if any of those are bugs you would like written up, let me know. > Thanks, > Phil. Yeah, 0publish-gui could use some work... -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------