Re: Timestamp/manifest problems caused by Antivirus
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG4opy8FMNDdx_GGFs-6_SvHq3SuxzJzrn=4a+ii+H68=1ZMYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 28 May 2016 at 12:18, Bastian Eicher <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > a recent error report of a Zero Install for Windows user made me aware of an > interesting issue: Some Windows Antivirus tools seem to modify the "last > modified" timestamps of executables they scan. This then causes generated > manifest digests to mismatch the expected values listed in feeds. > > In my opinion, this kind of behavior is a bug in the Antivirus tool since it > should not "touch" a file it is only scanning. However, it does lead me to > wonder whether a new manifest format that does not include timestamps might > be useful, at least for applications that are not affected by them. After > all, tools like "make" that make decisions based on comparing the age of two > files are more of an exception than the rule, at least in the Windows world. > > What do you guys think? Does sound like a scanner bug. Could we set the file as read-only to prevent it updating it? -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e