Re: Re: Proposal for API-Addition

On Tuesday 19 April 2005 07:53, ryan p bobko wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Sorry this isn't in the thread of Martin's email (is that possible when
> reading the list in digest?), but I agree with him. In fact, I'd like to
> see a much more object-oriented interface to libOfx. At the moment, it's
> very easy to use and works in C and C++ programs without a hitch, but
> there's no hiding the fact that it's all just C. Plenty of folks like OO

I'm all for it, however, experience has tought me that I don't want to have 
two layers to maintain, so it will have to be C (structs with setter and 
getters).  However if you then want to build a C++ layex, it's going to be 
really, really simple ;)

> programming, and I know when I started with libOfx, that's the first thing
> I wanted. It seems to me that most of the up-and-coming accounting projects
> are Qt based. (Yes, I may be biased...)

You may ;)

-- 
Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCZ7pAmZ6zzPlLuwMRAqW7AKDQeUGd9pprFew3IbSO9VSZUNteFACgrz6M
Nrw3n6XOBv/slC6bTnbvfg0=
=bkHE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----