Re: Loan accounts
Edward Reid <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:24:58 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.finance.moneydance.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No, the MD loan calculator is a simple one. However, you can do a lot with Excel. I put together a sample amortization schedule calculator. See http://paleo.org/private/AmortizationCalculator.xls It's a quick thing so I include a caveat that you must verify the calculations independently, but it worked in the tests I did. Note that it will not compute loan targets (principal, interest rate, payment, or duration); it just computes the amortization schedule with arbitrary additional payments. It only does monthly payments, though changing it to handle payments at other intervals would not be difficult. It displays values using the $ sign, but it's currency-agnostic. (Actually I'm not sure -- it may use the system settings for the currency sign.) Loan points, as Edward Melia already pointed out, are a fee. However, they are not a pure fee, but a hybrid of a fee and a lump interest payment. At least in the US, the APR on the loan must be calculated as though points are interest. This makes sense, because the reason for paying points, when optional, is usually to reduce the stated interest rate -- but it can result in confusion because the reported APR differs from the advertised APR. For example, about ten years ago I took out a mortgage, and paid 3 points (about $3000 on a $99,900 mortgage) to lower the interest rate from 6.5% to 5.75% -- made sense in my situation, which was that I planned to stay in the house for a long time. Generally it makes sense to pay points to lower the interest rate if you are going to pay on schedule for a decade or more, but not if you expect to sell (or otherwise pay off the loan) in two or three years. (Points are not always optional, but I would avoid a lender which required me to pay points unless the deal were very good and the lender very reputable.) >I would question the usefulness of having 'loan accounts' in >Moneydance at all. It would be better to let the user invent a >policy for dealing with the figures that agrees with the methods and >terminology used by the lender. For your balance to have so large a discrepancy, I suspect there must have been a discrepancy in the setup. I've seen balances off by several dollars, but nowhere near what you have. I don't completely trust the loan principal balances that MD shows, but they have been pretty close. I've wondered whether a more flexible setup, allowing the user to pick various parameters to specify the details of the lender's calculations, would work. Or if it would be possible to compute the lender's method of calculation from the first two or three payment breakdowns. I have not studied loan practices enough to know. (And it's unlikely that I will.) Larry Stone wrote: >You can always "roll your own" and enter it as a credit card. Have >all payments apply to principal and then add the interest to the >balance as you see it on statements. Moneydance won't be allocating >payments between principal and interest for you but that would >probably be easier for you to keep in sync with the bank. You don't even have to call it a credit card. Enter it as a loan but do NOT set up the transaction reminders to enter automatically. Instead, wait until you get the payment details, then adjust the principal and interest before entering the transaction. This of course is a brute force method and not as easy as a better calculation, but it works. Edward _______________________________________________ For Moneydance customer support, please visit http://help.infinitekind.com [email protected] http://moneydance.com/mailman/listinfo/moneydance-info