Re: no `stable' cache file in `~/.fonts'

Akira TAGOH <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig
Message-ID <CACT-Cx0B9J8frXUyw6vgWJdLJZwU1kmxJPARPodRiXQNR7R98g@mail.gmail.com>
In that version, we've tried to prevent the race on updating caches by
re-scanning a directory after updating a cache once. which isn't being done
on the latest anymore.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> [fontconfig 2.11.0]
>
> Running
>
>   fc-cache -v
>
> as a normal user, I see the following.
>
>     /usr/share/fonts: skipping, existing cache is valid: 0 fonts, 11 dirs
>     /usr/share/fonts/100dpi: skipping, existing cache is valid: 398 fonts,
> 0 dirs
>     ...
> ->  /home/wl/.fonts: skipping, existing cache is valid: 56 fonts, 1 dirs
>     /home/wl/.fonts/texlive: skipping, existing cache is valid: 0 fonts, 3
> dirs
>     /home/wl/.fonts/texlive/opentype: skipping, existing cache is valid:
> 0 fonts, 12 dirs
>     /home/wl/.fonts/texlive/opentype/adobe: skipping, existing cache is
> valid: 0 fonts, 3 dirs
>     /home/wl/.fonts/texlive/opentype/adobe/sourcecodepro: skipping,
> existing cache is valid: 14 fonts, 0 dirs
>     ...
> ->  /home/wl/.fonts: caching, new cache contents: 56 fonts, 1 dirs
>     ...
>     fc-cache: succeeded
>
> (I've added `fonts/{opentype,truetype,type1}' from a TeXLive
> installation as symlinks to `~/.fonts/texlive'.)
>
> What I don't understand are the two marked lines: Why does fontconfig
> first report a valid cache, then doing a caching operation inspite of
> this?
>
>
>     Werner
> _______________________________________________
> Fontconfig mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
>



-- 
Akira TAGOH

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.