Re: no `stable' cache file in `~/.fonts'
Akira TAGOH <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACT-Cx0B9J8frXUyw6vgWJdLJZwU1kmxJPARPodRiXQNR7R98g@mail.gmail.com> |
In that version, we've tried to prevent the race on updating caches by re-scanning a directory after updating a cache once. which isn't being done on the latest anymore. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > > [fontconfig 2.11.0] > > Running > > fc-cache -v > > as a normal user, I see the following. > > /usr/share/fonts: skipping, existing cache is valid: 0 fonts, 11 dirs > /usr/share/fonts/100dpi: skipping, existing cache is valid: 398 fonts, > 0 dirs > ... > -> /home/wl/.fonts: skipping, existing cache is valid: 56 fonts, 1 dirs > /home/wl/.fonts/texlive: skipping, existing cache is valid: 0 fonts, 3 > dirs > /home/wl/.fonts/texlive/opentype: skipping, existing cache is valid: > 0 fonts, 12 dirs > /home/wl/.fonts/texlive/opentype/adobe: skipping, existing cache is > valid: 0 fonts, 3 dirs > /home/wl/.fonts/texlive/opentype/adobe/sourcecodepro: skipping, > existing cache is valid: 14 fonts, 0 dirs > ... > -> /home/wl/.fonts: caching, new cache contents: 56 fonts, 1 dirs > ... > fc-cache: succeeded > > (I've added `fonts/{opentype,truetype,type1}' from a TeXLive > installation as symlinks to `~/.fonts/texlive'.) > > What I don't understand are the two marked lines: Why does fontconfig > first report a valid cache, then doing a caching operation inspite of > this? > > > Werner > _______________________________________________ > Fontconfig mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig > -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig