Re: Streamlining fontconfig scanning

"Keith Packard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> writes:

> I understand why it was added, but hoping that many many years later, we
> can actually remove it and call font bugs what they are: bugs.

Yeah, I can definitely agree on that -- the majority of the fonts I
found with trouble were clearly subsetted and sold for cheap. The
problem is that these fonts over-represent the languages they support,
and you end up with blanks where characters should be. Of course,
picking fonts by language support is not something we usually want to do
with display fonts anyways, so maybe the bugs won't have that much
negative impact.

-- 
-keith

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Hm+C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.