Re: Next steps for a reproducible Fontconfig?

"Keith Packard" <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jan 2019 02:54:16 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> writes:

$ cat /run/host/font-dirs.xml
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
> <fontconfig>
>     <remap-dir real-path="/usr/share/fonts">/run/host/fonts</remap-dir>
>     <remap-dir real-path="/home/alex/.fonts">/run/host/user-fonts</remap-dir>
> </fontconfig>
>
> Is this format acceptable? Its mostly about naming the nodes and the
> attributes, so its basically trivial. If you want i can rename things
> or change orders, but I'd really just like an Ack on something.

Format looks OK.

I think we might bike-shed on the names here a bit -- 'real-path' is
pretty ambiguous as both paths are 'real', one is just the file system
path and the other is the cache path. I like using the file system path
as the contents of the element and the cache path as the property, but
perhaps the property name could be 'cache-path' instead?

-- 
-keith

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)