Re: Next steps for a reproducible Fontconfig?

Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:06:49 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig
Message-ID <CAHr-Lraexf_43vZ4jmTC2Mu5ZjUPVjHpNS7wqG8DQt8hQCjHww@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:02 PM Alexander Larsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:59 AM Alexander Larsson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:54 AM Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> writes:
> > >
> > > $ cat /run/host/font-dirs.xml
> > > > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > > > <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
> > > > <fontconfig>
> > > >     <remap-dir real-path="/usr/share/fonts">/run/host/fonts</remap-dir>
> > > >     <remap-dir real-path="/home/alex/.fonts">/run/host/user-fonts</remap-dir>
> > > > </fontconfig>
> > > >
> > > > Is this format acceptable? Its mostly about naming the nodes and the
> > > > attributes, so its basically trivial. If you want i can rename things
> > > > or change orders, but I'd really just like an Ack on something.
> > >
> > > Format looks OK.
> > >
> > > I think we might bike-shed on the names here a bit -- 'real-path' is
> > > pretty ambiguous as both paths are 'real', one is just the file system
> > > path and the other is the cache path. I like using the file system path
> > > as the contents of the element and the cache path as the property, but
> > > perhaps the property name could be 'cache-path' instead?
> >
> > Or maybe 'cache-as' ?
>
> Actually, i think cache-path fits better with the "remap-dir" node
> name. I'll change the PR.

https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/2635#issuecomment-457158368
_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig