Re: Next steps for a reproducible Fontconfig?
Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:28:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontconfig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHr-LrZZsZEOPNu6A+qVcPEd8gNOJF32w22FUEXgohUerwhQNQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:02 PM Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> writes: > Do we need to process the 'salt' elements and 'remap-dir' elements in > order and remap old salt elements as remap-dir elements get loaded? That > also seems fragile to me. > > Perhaps some command that the flatpak could run to generate host salt > values so that it could remap them into new salt elements using the > mapped paths? > > Alternatively, we could just assume that only flatpak will use the salt > mechanism and leave this for a future enhancement? I think in practice salt on the host-side of something like this will only be there if we're using multiple levels of containers, which all pass down the outermost fonts. I don't think this is going to be very common at all, so maybe just ignoring it for now is fine? _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig