Re: release?
Jose Da Silva <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontforge.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On December 5, 2013 08:13:34 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sorry, to clarify: > > I am (one of) the Fedora fontforge package maintainers. I've had a > request to update it, but I'm not happy just blindly picking some git > release to push to all our users. :) I agree you'll want to avoid picking a random release at the moment. I'm not satisfied with our current make system, and have pushed off doing anything about it since it got a major overhaul back in 2012, and as you might see in the list of issues, it could use some edits. as a compromise between what you are looking for and what we're trying for We can try for Jan 1st - at minimum, call it git tag marker 2.0.20140101 > So, a real source release (where things had been stablized for that > release) would be excellent. Barring that, I guess some known more > stable git hash would be worth trying? Seeing such a large number of issues that have yet to be solved, I'm doubtful there is going to be stable release soon, but as you've mentioned, and others in the past have mentioned as well, FontForge hasn't put out a version that can be considered an update - yet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk