Re: FontAnvil 0.1
Max Rabkin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontforge.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFzzMPMGXin5W+uJMT_HS4aRLL=_bdnQYyxUF_fqJ7G=phn_w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this a fontforge fork? > It appears to be. I don't see the advantages of a fork for removing features. Isn't a build-time option better? Is it not already possible to build fontforge without dependencies on X? I'm sure I made such a build years ago. --Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fontforge-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-devel