Advantage of uthash over glib2 hash?

Ben Martin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.fonts.fontforge.devel
Message-ID <1406360663.6633.161.camel@sam>
Hi,
  I am wondering what advantages using uthash has over using glib2/hash?

  I know I created a double link list API a while back, before glib2 was
a fontforge dep, and hope at some stage to convert that over to using
glib2 lists instead (ie,
https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.37/glib-Doubly-Linked-Lists.html).

  I know it's a bit of a leading question, but... Are folks happy with
trying to use the glib2 collections in fontforge? Are there better ones
that we should try to move towards?




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.