Advantage of uthash over glib2 hash?
Ben Martin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontforge.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1406360663.6633.161.camel@sam> |
Hi, I am wondering what advantages using uthash has over using glib2/hash? I know I created a double link list API a while back, before glib2 was a fontforge dep, and hope at some stage to convert that over to using glib2 lists instead (ie, https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.37/glib-Doubly-Linked-Lists.html). I know it's a bit of a leading question, but... Are folks happy with trying to use the glib2 collections in fontforge? Are there better ones that we should try to move towards? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds