Re: Goto considered dramafull

I think if you do the work and it's stable and runs, why not?
On 30 Aug 2014 02:15, "Thomas Shinnick" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I do not wish to start any drama nor religious wars.  I'm just struck by
> the number of places in python.c where the same cleanup-on-error stanzas of
> free()s / DECREF's and other code occur a number of times in one routine.
> It makes one nervous whether they all are *correctly* duplicated.
>
> One accepted answer is just to repeat each group of lines ad nauseum, as
> needed, even if needed 6 times in one routine.  (!)
>
> Another answer is to consolidate into one stanza reached by multiple
> goto's.  All necessary free()s/DECREF's/etc. collected together.  But
> that's "goto", consider by some worse than GMO brocolli.
>
> As a data point, I find "goto" used a number of times in FF already:
>     mainline  155
>     gdraw      11
>     gutils     74
> as well as in of course GNUlib and other friends.
>
> Y'all have an absolute aversion to "goto" ?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> fontforge-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-devel
> http://fontforge.10959.n7.nabble.com/Developer-f3.html
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/

_______________________________________________
fontforge-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-devel
http://fontforge.10959.n7.nabble.com/Developer-f3.html