Re: Funding FontForge
Frank Trampe <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Apr 2016 03:28:04 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.fontforge.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANkSbhq8fbkHeRjqnQFjYg-c_dGaR-Aq-Zmf2w8bRzvHE0=Q5w@mail.gmail.com> |
Jose, I really think that you need to give FontForge and TruFont another look. FontForge was indeed very broken for a few years due to a lack of developer leadership and the merging of bad pull requests. But I've spent the last few years fixing most of the damage and carefully reviewing pull requests (or holding them until I have time to do so). We've even fixed things that were broken from the George Williams days. I think that if you try a recent build of FontForge, you will find it to be as stable as a 2012 build, if not more so. TruFont does indeed use Qt, but I don't see why this is a matter for objection. Are you suggesting that Adrien write his own widget kit like FontForge? Or that he use GTK? GTK is fine, but not massively better than Qt, and there's no reason in this day and age (of widespread Unicode support) to write another widget kit. I know that it wasn't an option back in 2000, but I sure wish that FontForge used a standard widget kit. The effort on TruFont will not be wasted and will in fact be very well spent if it succeeds in implementing FontForge-level features in an appropriate programming language with a comprehensible, sane, and extensible object model. Adrien has shown himself in his FontForge work to be a skilled developer, and, with the right level of community and developer support, I expect that his project will succeed. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, jb <[email protected]> wrote: > Jose Da Silva wrote: > > > > > out of curiosity, are you able to build/compile the latest FontForge, > > libspiro, libuninameslist, or are you locked with an older version? > > > > what builds, what doesn't, if you've tried something recent. > > > > gort 7% ./fontforge -version > Copyright (c) 2000-2012 by George Williams. > Executable based on sources from 14:57 GMT 31-Jul-2012-NoPython. > Library based on sources from 14:57 GMT 31-Jul-2012. > fontforge 20120731 > libfontforge 20120731 > > > > I had something newer running a few months ... who am > I kidding, it was probably over a year ago now :) > > But I'm pretty much done with the "upgrade" cycle. Too > many new breakages, too few old fixages. Maybe a newer > one is 'better' but it's not worth the hassle to find out. > > Just look at this new project - all gaga over Qt. Whoopee. > I'm so excited. Want to talk wasted effort ? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications > Manager > Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple > tiers of > your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and > reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z > _______________________________________________ > fontforge-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-devel > http://fontforge.10959.n7.nabble.com/Developer-f3.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ fontforge-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-devel http://fontforge.10959.n7.nabble.com/Developer-f3.html