Re: -warmup

Ahmet Göksu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.fonts.freetype.devel
Message-ID <0083bc5e-eb06-4e92-b802-437df4a0e810@Spark>
> I still think that for such cases the number of iterations of the affected tests should be increased to get more precise values.
the times are for single iteration. (chunk median/chunk size)
> Please separate this line slightly from the rest of the table
> and print the *cumulated timing* (in 's', not 'µs') of all tests,
> something like
i will asap!

Best,
Goksu
goksu.in
On 29 Aug 2023 22:09 +0300, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]>, wrote:
>
> > here is the results with chris’ suggestion. (thanks chris)
>
> Much better, thanks!
>
> > still a bit noise on only load and load_advances. are results
> > acceptable?
>
> As far as I can see, the biggest differences occur if the 'Baseline'
> and 'Benchmark' columns contain very small values. I still think that
> for such cases the number of iterations of the affected tests should
> be increased to get more precise values. Please try that.
>
> Something else: I think that the 'TOTAL' line doesn't make sense right
> now. Please separate this line slightly from the rest of the table
> and print the *cumulated timing* (in 's', not 'µs') of all tests,
> something like
>
> Total duration for all tests: 25.3s
>
> and
>
> Total duration of tests for 'Roboto_subset.ttf: 3.4s
>
>
> Werner
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.