Re: Fonts looking washed out with newer freetype versions
Peter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.fonts.freetype.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 09.03.21 um 11:55 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > >> Here are two more images that contrast the rendering output of >> FreeType 2.6.1 with that of a patched version of FreeType 2.10.1 >> using the old default LCD filter. The filter definitely has a >> conceivable impact that brings the output closer to that of FreeType >> 2.6.1. But there are still differences especially concerning the >> saturation of the outer blue shades of the glyphs (some of which I >> have marked). > > Have you actually played around with the `ftview` tool? Right now, > this is the only recommendation I can give to exactly find out what's > going on... > > > Werner > Yes, I did. I tried to reproduce the output of version 2.6.1 of the 'ftview' demo tool with version 2.10.1. But even with the exact same settings (hinting, gamma, LCD filter etc.) the output that version 2.10.1 produces differs from that of version 2.6.1. The fonts rendered with version 2.6.1 are darker and their stems thicker. I'm not sure how to describe this properly, but I also perceive the fonts rendered with version 2.6.1 as sharper than their counterparts rendered with version 2.10.1. I have attached several images and comparisons of the respective outputs that hopefully make this difference apparent. The text strings in the comparison images are taken from the two 'ftview' outputs. The upper string is in each case taken from the output of version 2.6.1 of the 'ftview' demo tool and the lower one from version 2.10.1.
ftview_2-6-1_output.png
(image/png, 148.5 KB) - not displayed
ftview_2-10-1_output.png
(image/png, 103.4 KB) - not displayed
comparison1.png
(image/png, 6.9 KB) - not displayed
comparison2-zoom4x.png
(image/png, 5.8 KB) - not displayed
comparison3-zoom8x.png
(image/png, 7.8 KB) - not displayed